Last week, I did the case study about Central City, I am not satisfied with my work, this week I read the case again and find some new ideas about it, anyway,some ideas is not related to this case closely.
1. Government do the Affirmative Action for increase the minorities employment, but it results a unfair situation, I think there are too many case like that, government set up some policies aiming to build a fair situation, but it caused a large "unfair". For example, in China, government said student with some special ability on sport will have extra points added to their college examination score. This policy wish to give the athletic student same opportunity to study in university, but some regular student spent money to get the fake license or proof of athletic student, that really did a bad effect on the Chinese education environment.
2. Sometimes group slow down the government's efficiency, so government must find the balance of it.
Otherwise, it really cost more money, labor and time.
3.The Human Resources Department should have a standard process to do the promotion, not just "there is a standard but we do not use it", if there is a policy by law, people can not to change or miss it.
4. I think the leader should not is a man just to sign the paper, leader should know all part of the corporation, and can catch all the information from the inside and outside the corporation, than communicate with the group and make the decision. In other word, in my view, leader is not a simple people like others of the corporation, he or she would be a "superman" that not just doing his or her own job, he or she would focus on the whole.
沒有留言:
張貼留言